![]() Sharing Source Files Between Multiple Programs 4. Making Lists of Files Easier to Read 3.6. ![]() Specifying the Name of the Target (Output) File 3.2. Less Simple Things to Do With Builds 3.1. SCons Functions Are Order-Independent 2.6. SConstruct Files Are Python Scripts 2.5.2. Running Multiple Versions of SCons Side-by-Side 2. A Caveat About This Guide's Completeness 4. There are a lot of options in Preferences, including: auto_complete, auto_complete_size_limit, auto_complete_delay, auto_complete_selector, auto_complete_triggers, auto_complete_commit_on_tab, auto_complete_with_fields, auto_complete_cycle, auto_complete_use_index, auto_complete_use_history, auto_complete_preserve_order, auto_complete_trailing_symbols, and more.ĭoes anyone know the precise set of preferences to make it behave exactly like it used to? Or maybe there is a package that fixes it? Or maybe my next step will be reverting to the previous version.Table of Contents Preface 1. It wouldn't even give me "question" as an option - I would have to backspace over the n and then hit tab in order to get a popup that included that word, because not only is the popup annoying, with it requiring multiple additional keystrokes, but autocorrect no longer corrects to a word of the same length as my currently misspelled word, only to longer ones. Now it doesn't do that - now it would pop up a list of any longer words, such as "questions" and "questioned", and then I would have to arrow to one of them and hit enter. It now has a pop-up from which I must select a choice - before I would just hit tab and it would choose the best option for me (I could then tab again to try for a better answer).Ī concrete example: before, when I typed a word with a typo, for example "questino", I could, with my cursor directly after the o, hit tab and it would correct it to "question" automatically. Now auto complete behaves completely differently. I recently, too-trustingly, upgraded my Sublime Text 3 to Version 4 (Build 4107). I'm totally unaware of how things work in production, and I'm also not confident about my git knowledge, so sorry if this question seems naive or whatsoever. I just want to make sure if this is how "multiple versions with same code-base" projects are handled generally? If not, how is it commonly done? (A simple link or keyword to what I should look into would be helpful enough) This works fine on normal features, but when there is a minor bug (say, a typo) on the main branch, having to go over all these every time just so that the patched code could get to the client branches just seem kind of awkward and. ![]() Rebase client_a_branch and client_b_branch on main.Create branch new_feature_branch from main.Now I have a new feature that I want to work on, which applies to both A and B. These branches often have client-specific changes. A wants a blue theme and B wants a green one, so currently I just have them on two separate branches. Say I have a project (one code base) that is for two clients A and B. My macro-question is: Much like IntelliJ maintains dozens of IDEs that have almost the same basic functionalities but are built into different versions, is there some specific VCS tactic or best practices for doing so? I guess it's my git workflow that is mistaken, but I need some heads up on what I'm doing wrong. I'm currently working on a (laravel) project that should result in two versions, but I find myself constantly rebasing and merging my code.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |